Telemetry
Integration guide

OpenAI Agent Telemetry

Log OpenAI agent runs, tool calls, model usage, latency, cost, and final outcomes with structured events.

Reviewed by the Telemetry product team on . Instrumentation contract, privacy boundaries, and implementation guidance. Review standards and ownership

Useful for
  • AI agent observability
  • LLM cost tracking
  • Tool-call debugging
Measurement path

Connect detailed execution to a durable product outcome

Keep step-level traces in the specialist tracing path, then emit one compact terminal event that can join agent quality, cost, reliability, and product behavior.

  1. 1

    Agent run

    Start with an approved run identifier, workflow, model, and prompt version.

  2. 2

    Tools and retries

    Retain detailed steps in tracing and categorize failures without copying payloads.

  3. 3

    Terminal outcome

    Emit success, failure, cancellation, or human handoff with cost and duration.

  4. 4

    SQL decision

    Compare accepted outcomes, failures, and unit economics by feature and release.

Before you start

Prerequisites and boundaries

  • The OpenAI Agents SDK and telemetry-sh packages initialized in a server runtime
  • A documented workflow name and terminal success, failure, and handoff outcomes
  • A decision about which prompt, tool-input, and output content must remain excluded

Delivery setup

Install and initialize server-side

Import telemetry-sh in server-only code and initialize it once with process.env.TELEMETRY_API_KEY. Keep ingestion credentials out of browser bundles, client-visible environment variables, source control, logs, and exception messages.

openai-agents-install

npm installation

bash
npm install telemetry-sh
  1. 1Prepare one reusable server-side delivery client with bounded network behavior.
  2. 2Add the outcome event at the success, failure, retry, or timeout boundary.
  3. 3Send controlled fixtures and inspect the stored rows before enabling an alert.

Snippet

Start with one structured event

Add this shape where the workflow completes, fails, or retries. Then build the dashboard from real fields.

openai-agents

OpenAI Agent Telemetry event

javascript
await telemetry.log("agent_tool_called", {
  run_id: runId,
  workflow: "support_resolution",
  agent_name: "support_agent",
  model: "gpt-4.1",
  tool_name: "lookup_order",
  status: "success",
  latency_ms: 842,
  retry_count: 0,
  estimated_cost_usd: 0.018,
  prompt_version: "support-v3",
  release: process.env.APP_RELEASE,
});

Event contract

run_id, workflow, agent_name, model, and prompt_version

status, duration_ms, retry_count, total_tokens, and estimated_cost_usd

tool_name, tool_status, human_handoff, reviewer_outcome, and release

Implementation checkpoints

Checkpoint 1

Emit one compact product outcome when the complete run finishes; keep SDK traces for step-level debugging instead of copying every span into a second system.

Checkpoint 2

Use a shared run_id or approved trace_id to connect separate tool events without storing tool arguments or results.

Checkpoint 3

Exercise tool failure, guardrail rejection, handoff, cancellation, and exporter-flush behavior before relying on completion-rate dashboards.

Verification

Prove the event arrived

Run this after exercising known success and failure cases. Replace the fallback table name if your final event contract differs from the snippet.

openai-agents-verification

OpenAI Agent Telemetry verification query

sql
SELECT *
FROM agent_tool_called
ORDER BY timestamp_utc DESC
LIMIT 20;
Confirm one terminal row per logical outcome, with the expected status, identifiers, units, and UTC time.
Inspect the inferred schema and verify that retries do not change field types or generate a new logical event ID.
Search the stored fields for credentials, raw payloads, prompts, private content, and unbounded error messages.
Exercise a provider timeout, ingestion rejection, and process shutdown before treating the dashboard as complete.

Implementation references

Review the event contract, data-safety guidance, and upstream primary documentation before enabling a new production path.

Production boundary

Keep the outcome event small and recoverable

This pattern provides

  • A bounded, SQL-ready outcome beside the upstream workflow.
  • Stable fields for dashboards, alerts, and cross-event correlation.
  • A fixture-driven path for validating success, failure, retry, and timeout behavior.

This pattern does not provide

  • An OTLP exporter, automatic collection pipeline, or replacement for detailed traces and diagnostic logs.
  • Exactly-once delivery merely because the payload contains an event ID.
  • Permission to collect raw provider payloads, user content, credentials, or regulated data.

Event schema starting points

Review the row grain, emit boundary, required types, privacy classes, example payload, and validation checklist before adapting a query or snippet to production.

Related product capability

Continue this workflow in AI agent monitoring

Connect agent runs, tool use, model cost, quality, and product outcomes with reviewable SQL.

Related SQL recipes

Answer the next question with SQL

Run the query against the structured fields from this workflow, inspect the example result, and turn a useful answer into a dashboard or alert.

Browse all recipes
Security and auditBeginner

Audit AI Agent Tool Authorization Decisions

Which agent tools are denied or routed to human approval most often?

Open recipe
AI and LLMIntermediate

Find AI Quality Regressions by Prompt Version

Did the new prompt version improve quality without increasing human handoffs?

Open recipe
Structured eventsAdvanced

Reconstruct a Correlated Workflow Timeline

What happened, in order, during the latest failed workflow?

Open recipe
Structured eventsIntermediate

Query Nested AI Tool-Call Events

Which AI tools and arguments are associated with the most failed calls?

Open recipe
AI and LLMIntermediate

Detect Repeating AI Agent Tool Loops

Which agent runs appear stuck in a repetitive tool loop?

Open recipe
AI and LLMBeginner

Calculate LLM Cost by Feature and Model

Which product features and models are driving LLM spend?

Open recipe
AI and LLMIntermediate

Measure LLM Cache Savings and Retry Cost

How much model cost is associated with retries and cache misses?

Open recipe
AI and LLMIntermediate

Measure LLM Time to First Token

Which model and feature combinations feel slow before output begins?

Open recipe
AI and LLMIntermediate

Measure Accepted AI Outputs per Dollar

Which model and feature combination produces the most accepted outputs per dollar?

Open recipe
AI and LLMIntermediate

Measure AI Agent Task Success and Human Handoff

Which agent workflows finish successfully and produce accepted outcomes?

Open recipe
AI and LLMIntermediate

Evaluate RAG Retrieval Quality by Version

Did the new RAG pipeline improve retrieval and grounded-answer rates?

Open recipe

Browse by implementation family

Compare related integration patterns

Templates to pair with this integration

More integrations