LiteLLM Gateway and SDK Telemetry: from boundary to verified row
Use LiteLLM Gateway and SDK Telemetry at a controlled application boundary, keep the event contract small, and verify a known outcome before building aggregate views.
- 1
Choose the outcome
Cross-provider LLM reliability
- 2
Define the contract
operation_id, feature, requested_model, response_model, provider, route, and release
- 3
Instrument the boundary
A wrapper gives the application ownership of the final product outcome; a LiteLLM callback can supplement it with gateway-reported cost and routing context.
- 4
Verify the evidence
Exercise a known fixture, then inspect litellm_request_completed for one correctly typed terminal row.
Before you start
Prerequisites and boundaries
- LiteLLM and telemetry-sh initialized in a trusted Python service
- Stable feature, route, model-alias, provider, team, and release dimensions
- A reviewed callback or wrapper boundary that excludes model content
Delivery setup
Install and initialize server-side
Initialize Telemetry for synchronous code or TelemetryAsync for asyncio code once per process with a server-side key. Keep ingestion credentials out of browser bundles, client-visible environment variables, source control, logs, and exception messages.
pip installation
python -m pip install telemetry-sh- 1Prepare one reusable server-side delivery client with bounded network behavior.
- 2Add the outcome event at the success, failure, retry, or timeout boundary.
- 3Send controlled fixtures and inspect the stored rows before enabling an alert.
Snippet
Start with one structured event
Add this shape where the workflow completes, fails, or retries. Then build the dashboard from real fields.
LiteLLM Gateway and SDK Telemetry event
from time import perf_counter
from litellm import completion
def complete_with_outcome(messages, operation_id: str):
started_at = perf_counter()
status = "success"
error_type = None
response = None
try:
response = completion(
model="openai/gpt-5.6",
messages=messages,
)
return response
except Exception as error:
status = "failed"
error_type = classify_gateway_error(error)
raise
finally:
usage = getattr(response, "usage", None)
telemetry.log("litellm_request_completed", {
"operation_id": operation_id,
"feature": "support_draft",
"requested_model": "openai/gpt-5.6",
"response_model": getattr(response, "model", None),
"status": status,
"error_type": error_type,
"duration_ms": round((perf_counter() - started_at) * 1000),
"input_tokens": getattr(usage, "prompt_tokens", 0),
"output_tokens": getattr(usage, "completion_tokens", 0),
"release": APP_RELEASE,
})Event contract
operation_id, feature, requested_model, response_model, provider, route, and release
status, duration_ms, input_tokens, output_tokens, retry_count, fallback_used, and error_type
estimated_cost_usd, pricing_version, accepted, cache_hit, account_id, and environment when approved
Implementation checkpoints
Checkpoint 1
A wrapper gives the application ownership of the final product outcome; a LiteLLM callback can supplement it with gateway-reported cost and routing context.
Checkpoint 2
Separate the requested model alias from the provider response model so fallback behavior remains queryable.
Checkpoint 3
Do not copy messages, responses, tool payloads, virtual keys, provider credentials, or unrestricted exceptions into Telemetry.
Verification
Prove the event arrived
Run this after exercising known success and failure cases. Replace the fallback table name if your final event contract differs from the snippet.
LiteLLM Gateway and SDK Telemetry verification query
SELECT *
FROM litellm_request_completed
ORDER BY timestamp_utc DESC
LIMIT 20;Implementation references
Review the event contract, data-safety guidance, and upstream primary documentation before enabling a new production path.
Production boundary
Keep the outcome event small and recoverable
This pattern provides
- A bounded, SQL-ready outcome beside the upstream workflow.
- Stable fields for dashboards, alerts, and cross-event correlation.
- A fixture-driven path for validating success, failure, retry, and timeout behavior.
This pattern does not provide
- An OTLP exporter, automatic collection pipeline, or replacement for detailed traces and diagnostic logs.
- Exactly-once delivery merely because the payload contains an event ID.
- Permission to collect raw provider payloads, user content, credentials, or regulated data.
Event schema starting points
Event contracts for this workflow
Review the row grain, emit boundary, required types, privacy classes, example payload, and validation checklist before adapting a query or snippet to production.
Related product capability
Continue this workflow in AI agent monitoring
Connect agent runs, tool use, model cost, quality, and product outcomes with reviewable SQL.
Related SQL recipes
Answer the next question with SQL
Run the query against the structured fields from this workflow, inspect the example result, and turn a useful answer into a dashboard or alert.
Calculate LLM Cost by Feature and Model
Which product features and models are driving LLM spend?
Open recipeMeasure LLM Cache Savings and Retry Cost
How much model cost is associated with retries and cache misses?
Open recipeMeasure LLM Time to First Token
Which model and feature combinations feel slow before output begins?
Open recipeMeasure Accepted AI Outputs per Dollar
Which model and feature combination produces the most accepted outputs per dollar?
Open recipeDetect Error-Rate Spikes With a Rolling Baseline
Which hourly error-rate buckets are far above their recent baseline?
Open recipeBrowse by implementation family
Compare related integration patterns
Templates to pair with this integration
More integrations
OpenAI Responses API Telemetry
Measure OpenAI Responses API latency, token usage, tool activity, failures, and downstream outcomes without collecting prompts or generated content.
Open guideAnthropic Claude API Telemetry
Track Claude API token usage, model, latency, stop reason, errors, cost context, and reviewed product outcomes without storing prompts.
Open guideVercel AI SDK Telemetry
Track streaming completions, token usage, retries, latency, and accepted results from AI SDK workflows.
Open guide