Telemetry
Integration guide

LiteLLM Gateway and SDK Telemetry

Track LiteLLM provider routing, retries, fallbacks, token usage, latency, cost estimates, and accepted outcomes across a controlled model gateway.

Reviewed by the Telemetry product team on . Instrumentation contract, privacy boundaries, and implementation guidance. Review standards and ownership

Useful for
  • Cross-provider LLM reliability
  • Fallback and retry analysis
  • Model-gateway unit economics
Implementation evidence

LiteLLM Gateway and SDK Telemetry: from boundary to verified row

Use LiteLLM Gateway and SDK Telemetry at a controlled application boundary, keep the event contract small, and verify a known outcome before building aggregate views.

  1. 1

    Choose the outcome

    Cross-provider LLM reliability

  2. 2

    Define the contract

    operation_id, feature, requested_model, response_model, provider, route, and release

  3. 3

    Instrument the boundary

    A wrapper gives the application ownership of the final product outcome; a LiteLLM callback can supplement it with gateway-reported cost and routing context.

  4. 4

    Verify the evidence

    Exercise a known fixture, then inspect litellm_request_completed for one correctly typed terminal row.

Before you start

Prerequisites and boundaries

  • LiteLLM and telemetry-sh initialized in a trusted Python service
  • Stable feature, route, model-alias, provider, team, and release dimensions
  • A reviewed callback or wrapper boundary that excludes model content

Delivery setup

Install and initialize server-side

Initialize Telemetry for synchronous code or TelemetryAsync for asyncio code once per process with a server-side key. Keep ingestion credentials out of browser bundles, client-visible environment variables, source control, logs, and exception messages.

litellm-install

pip installation

bash
python -m pip install telemetry-sh
  1. 1Prepare one reusable server-side delivery client with bounded network behavior.
  2. 2Add the outcome event at the success, failure, retry, or timeout boundary.
  3. 3Send controlled fixtures and inspect the stored rows before enabling an alert.

Snippet

Start with one structured event

Add this shape where the workflow completes, fails, or retries. Then build the dashboard from real fields.

litellm

LiteLLM Gateway and SDK Telemetry event

python
from time import perf_counter
from litellm import completion

def complete_with_outcome(messages, operation_id: str):
    started_at = perf_counter()
    status = "success"
    error_type = None
    response = None

    try:
        response = completion(
            model="openai/gpt-5.6",
            messages=messages,
        )
        return response
    except Exception as error:
        status = "failed"
        error_type = classify_gateway_error(error)
        raise
    finally:
        usage = getattr(response, "usage", None)
        telemetry.log("litellm_request_completed", {
            "operation_id": operation_id,
            "feature": "support_draft",
            "requested_model": "openai/gpt-5.6",
            "response_model": getattr(response, "model", None),
            "status": status,
            "error_type": error_type,
            "duration_ms": round((perf_counter() - started_at) * 1000),
            "input_tokens": getattr(usage, "prompt_tokens", 0),
            "output_tokens": getattr(usage, "completion_tokens", 0),
            "release": APP_RELEASE,
        })

Event contract

operation_id, feature, requested_model, response_model, provider, route, and release

status, duration_ms, input_tokens, output_tokens, retry_count, fallback_used, and error_type

estimated_cost_usd, pricing_version, accepted, cache_hit, account_id, and environment when approved

Implementation checkpoints

Checkpoint 1

A wrapper gives the application ownership of the final product outcome; a LiteLLM callback can supplement it with gateway-reported cost and routing context.

Checkpoint 2

Separate the requested model alias from the provider response model so fallback behavior remains queryable.

Checkpoint 3

Do not copy messages, responses, tool payloads, virtual keys, provider credentials, or unrestricted exceptions into Telemetry.

Verification

Prove the event arrived

Run this after exercising known success and failure cases. Replace the fallback table name if your final event contract differs from the snippet.

litellm-verification

LiteLLM Gateway and SDK Telemetry verification query

sql
SELECT *
FROM litellm_request_completed
ORDER BY timestamp_utc DESC
LIMIT 20;
Confirm one terminal row per logical outcome, with the expected status, identifiers, units, and UTC time.
Inspect the inferred schema and verify that retries do not change field types or generate a new logical event ID.
Search the stored fields for credentials, raw payloads, prompts, private content, and unbounded error messages.
Exercise a provider timeout, ingestion rejection, and process shutdown before treating the dashboard as complete.

Implementation references

Review the event contract, data-safety guidance, and upstream primary documentation before enabling a new production path.

Production boundary

Keep the outcome event small and recoverable

This pattern provides

  • A bounded, SQL-ready outcome beside the upstream workflow.
  • Stable fields for dashboards, alerts, and cross-event correlation.
  • A fixture-driven path for validating success, failure, retry, and timeout behavior.

This pattern does not provide

  • An OTLP exporter, automatic collection pipeline, or replacement for detailed traces and diagnostic logs.
  • Exactly-once delivery merely because the payload contains an event ID.
  • Permission to collect raw provider payloads, user content, credentials, or regulated data.

Event schema starting points

Review the row grain, emit boundary, required types, privacy classes, example payload, and validation checklist before adapting a query or snippet to production.

Related product capability

Continue this workflow in AI agent monitoring

Connect agent runs, tool use, model cost, quality, and product outcomes with reviewable SQL.

Related SQL recipes

Answer the next question with SQL

Run the query against the structured fields from this workflow, inspect the example result, and turn a useful answer into a dashboard or alert.

Browse all recipes

Browse by implementation family

Compare related integration patterns

Templates to pair with this integration

More integrations