DSPy Program Evaluation Telemetry: from boundary to verified row
Use DSPy Program Evaluation Telemetry at a controlled application boundary, keep the event contract small, and verify a known outcome before building aggregate views.
- 1
Choose the outcome
DSPy program reliability
- 2
Define the contract
operation_id, program_name, program_version, model_alias, optimizer_name, and release
- 3
Instrument the boundary
Wrap the public DSPy module call for production outcomes and emit evaluator results separately after dspy.Evaluate completes.
- 4
Verify the evidence
Exercise a known fixture, then inspect dspy_program_completed for one correctly typed terminal row.
Before you start
Prerequisites and boundaries
- DSPy and telemetry-sh initialized in a trusted Python process
- Stable program, model, optimizer, dataset, metric, and release versions
- Separate event grains for live predictions and offline evaluation results
Delivery setup
Install and initialize server-side
Initialize Telemetry for synchronous code or TelemetryAsync for asyncio code once per process with a server-side key. Keep ingestion credentials out of browser bundles, client-visible environment variables, source control, logs, and exception messages.
pip installation
python -m pip install telemetry-sh- 1Prepare one reusable server-side delivery client with bounded network behavior.
- 2Add the outcome event at the success, failure, retry, or timeout boundary.
- 3Send controlled fixtures and inspect the stored rows before enabling an alert.
Snippet
Start with one structured event
Add this shape where the workflow completes, fails, or retries. Then build the dashboard from real fields.
DSPy Program Evaluation Telemetry event
from time import perf_counter
def run_support_program(program, question: str, operation_id: str):
started_at = perf_counter()
status = "success"
error_type = None
try:
return program(question=question)
except Exception as error:
status = "failed"
error_type = classify_program_error(error)
raise
finally:
telemetry.log("dspy_program_completed", {
"operation_id": operation_id,
"program_name": "support_answer",
"program_version": PROGRAM_VERSION,
"model_alias": MODEL_ALIAS,
"status": status,
"error_type": error_type,
"duration_ms": round((perf_counter() - started_at) * 1000),
"release": APP_RELEASE,
})Event contract
operation_id, program_name, program_version, model_alias, optimizer_name, and release
status, duration_ms, estimated_cost_usd, accepted, and error_type
dataset_version, metric_name, metric_version, evaluation_score, passed, and evaluated_at for evaluation events
Implementation checkpoints
Checkpoint 1
Wrap the public DSPy module call for production outcomes and emit evaluator results separately after dspy.Evaluate completes.
Checkpoint 2
Do not compare optimizer candidates that used different datasets, metrics, judge models, thresholds, or evaluation coverage without separating those versions.
Checkpoint 3
Keep examples, predictions, traces, metric feedback, prompts, and model history in the approved DSPy or observability workflow rather than copying them into Telemetry.
Verification
Prove the event arrived
Run this after exercising known success and failure cases. Replace the fallback table name if your final event contract differs from the snippet.
DSPy Program Evaluation Telemetry verification query
SELECT *
FROM dspy_program_completed
ORDER BY timestamp_utc DESC
LIMIT 20;Implementation references
Review the event contract, data-safety guidance, and upstream primary documentation before enabling a new production path.
Production boundary
Keep the outcome event small and recoverable
This pattern provides
- A bounded, SQL-ready outcome beside the upstream workflow.
- Stable fields for dashboards, alerts, and cross-event correlation.
- A fixture-driven path for validating success, failure, retry, and timeout behavior.
This pattern does not provide
- An OTLP exporter, automatic collection pipeline, or replacement for detailed traces and diagnostic logs.
- Exactly-once delivery merely because the payload contains an event ID.
- Permission to collect raw provider payloads, user content, credentials, or regulated data.
Event schema starting points
Event contracts for this workflow
Review the row grain, emit boundary, required types, privacy classes, example payload, and validation checklist before adapting a query or snippet to production.
Related product capability
Continue this workflow in AI agent monitoring
Connect agent runs, tool use, model cost, quality, and product outcomes with reviewable SQL.
Related SQL recipes
Answer the next question with SQL
Run the query against the structured fields from this workflow, inspect the example result, and turn a useful answer into a dashboard or alert.
Find AI Quality Regressions by Prompt Version
Did the new prompt version improve quality without increasing human handoffs?
Open recipeEvaluate RAG Retrieval Quality by Version
Did the new RAG pipeline improve retrieval and grounded-answer rates?
Open recipeMeasure Accepted AI Outputs per Dollar
Which model and feature combination produces the most accepted outputs per dollar?
Open recipeCalculate LLM Cost by Feature and Model
Which product features and models are driving LLM spend?
Open recipeBrowse by implementation family
Compare related integration patterns
Templates to pair with this integration
More integrations
Vercel AI SDK Telemetry
Track streaming completions, token usage, retries, latency, and accepted results from AI SDK workflows.
Open guideOpenAI Agent Telemetry
Log OpenAI agent runs, tool calls, model usage, latency, cost, and final outcomes with structured events.
Open guideGoogle Gemini API Telemetry
Track Gemini request latency, model usage, tokens, finish reason, errors, and reviewed product outcomes without storing prompts or generated content.
Open guide